Community Health Workers (CHWs) for Food Needs

There is sufficient evidence that Community Health Workers (CHW) interventions increase the consumption of healthy foods, reduce caregiver stress, reduce food insecurity, and support successful linkage to food benefit programs when engaged in such campaigns.

Assessment Post Image

Study Characteristics and Contextual Tags

chevron
Impact Assessment

A Community Health Worker (CHW) is "a frontline public health worker who is a trusted member of and/or has an unusually close understanding of the community served. This trusting relationship enables the worker to serve as a liaison/link/intermediary between health/social services and the community to facilitate access to services and improve the quality and cultural competence of service delivery[1]." "Community Health Worker" is an umbrella term that includes community health representatives, promotores de salud, and peers[2].

CHWs are typically found in community and clinical settings and make connections in the community they serve. CHW interventions can ensure that community and/or cultural linkages support the delivery of services. Over 85% of CHWs report delivering food and nutritional support[3]. This assessment reviewed studies where CHWs addressed food needs as part of the intervention. For many studies, food-related outcomes were not included.  

The findings below synthesize the results of the studies in the table across three domains of measurement:

  • Healthcare Cost, Utilization & Value: One study identified cost savings through reductions in hospital admissions and shorter durations of stay. There is mixed evidence as to whether CHW interventions can affect cost and utilization outcomes. 
  • Health: More evidence is needed to suggest that CHW interventions, including addressing food, can improve clinical outcomes in a targeted manner in conjunction with other social interventions. While studies indicated diabetes HbA1c rates were affected, the methods of measures and samples require further exploration.
  • Social: There is sufficient evidence that CHW interventions increase the consumption of healthy foods, reduce caregiver stress, reduce food insecurity, and support successful linkage to food benefit programs when engaged in such campaigns.
Background of the Need / Need Impact on Health

Food-related needs fall into three interrelated categories: food insecurity, nutrition insecurity, and dietary quality.

Food Insecurity

Food insecurity is defined as not having access to enough food. In 2021, 10.2% (13.5 million) of United States (U.S.) households reported being food insecure over the last year. Of families experiencing food insecurity, 6.4% (8.4 million) were identified as having low food security and 3.8% (5.1 million) were identified as having very low food security[4]. Food insecurity varies by race, ethnicity, household makeup, and income. Rates of food insecurity are higher than the national average (10.2%) for families that identify as Black (19.8%) or Hispanic/Latino (16.2%), for households with children (12.5%), and for households with income below 185% of the poverty line (26.5%)[5]. The majority of Medicaid enrollees fall in this low-income bracket. Additionally, food insecurity may be more common for those whose employment status, neighborhood of residence, and access to transportation further impact their food access[6],[7],[8].

Nutrition Insecurity

Nutrition security is the “consistent and equitable access to healthy, safe, affordable foods essential to optimal health and wellbeing[9].”  While most food insecure households are also nutrition insecure, food secure households can also be nutrition insecure. As most screenings focus on food security rather than nutrition security, national data on the prevalence of nutrition insecurity is not yet available. The concept of nutrition insecurity has been adopted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a core goal for their food-related initiatives. Nutrition security, beyond just food insecurity, is necessary to reduce the chronic illnesses caused as a result of poor nutrition[10].  

Dietary Quality 

While food and nutrition insecurity are primary drivers of poor diet, other factors such as food availability (food deserts), personal preference, nutrition knowledge, and other psychosocial factors may contribute to dietary options and choices[11]. Analysis found that 45% of U.S. adults have a poor diet[12]. According to analysis of a representative sample of U.S. high school students, only “8.5% of high school students nationwide met [USDA] fruit recommendations and 2.1% met vegetable recommendations[13].” Research on adult dietary consumption has shown that income is a predictor for inadequate vegetable consumption (only 7% of adults below or close to the poverty level consume adequate vegetables) but even high income groups had inadequate vegetable consumption (only 11.4% of adults in the highest income categories consume adequate vegetables)[14]. Healthy People 2030 includes a number of specific nutrition objectives including increasing calcium, potassium, fruit, and vegetable (including dark green, red and orange, beans and peas) consumption in people over age two[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21]

Health Impacts of Food and Nutrition Insecurity and Poor Diet

Having an unhealthy diet and poor nutrition is associated with a range of physical and behavioral health conditions that are disproportionately experienced by people of color. Poor diet is associated with both obesity and Type 2 diabetes, as well as other chronic health conditions such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Individuals experiencing food and nutrition insecurity are uniquely at risk and have a much higher risk of long-term chronic health conditions, including obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. Consuming unhealthy food and beverages, such as sugar-sweetened beverages and highly processed foods, puts people at higher risk of at least 13 types of cancer, including endometrial (uterine) cancer, breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and colorectal cancer.  

The length of time a person is food insecure impacts the severity of the health impacts. A study examining food insecurity in children over four years of age found that children who experienced food insecurity for longer periods of time had worse health outcomes[29].  

According to the CDC, among those ages 2 to 19, the prevalence of obesity was 19.7% and affected about 14.7 million. Childhood obesity is also more prevalent among certain racial and ethnic groups (26.2% among Hispanic/Latino children, 24.8% among non-Hispanic Black children). Obesity-related conditions include high blood pressure, high cholesterol, Type 2 diabetes, breathing problems such as asthma and sleep apnea, and joint problems[30].

The rate of cardiovascular disease in the Black population is disproportionately high and is a primary cause of differences in life expectancy between Black and White individuals[31]. Black Americans are disproportionately affected by colorectal cancer, with Black people being 20% more likely to develop colorectal cancer and 40% more likely to die from it than White people[32].

The impacts of food insecurity extend beyond diet-related diseases. Children who experience food insecurity have been shown to have a higher risk of iron deficiency anemia, lower non-cognitive performance, asthma, depression, suicide ideation, and tooth decay[33]. Food insecurity has been shown to be a major stressor in early childhood with implications for cognitive, language, motor, and socio-emotional skills[34]. Individuals experiencing food insecurity are more likely to go to the ER, less likely to have a usual source of care, and have higher healthcare costs[35],[36],[37],[38].

Background on the Intervention

A Community Health Worker (CHW) is a trusted member of the community who connects people to health and social services, and ensures these services are accessible and culturally appropriate. Known as promotores de salud in Spanish-speaking areas and as community health representatives in Indigenous communities, CHWs work in diverse settings, from community organizations to healthcare systems. By providing outreach, health education, and advocacy, CHWs help individuals and communities gain knowledge and confidence in managing their health. They play a vital role in underserved communities, addressing health inequities by linking people to resources—including food and nutrition services—and improving the quality of care[39]. 

Twenty-four states currently provide funding for CHWs through Medicaid, with several more states implementing policies to do so[40]. Among other eligibility criteria, many states allow Medicaid enrollees to use CHW services as a result of “a social drivers of health screening indicating unmet health-related social needs, such as housing or food insecurity[41].” Coverage models and authorized services vary, including health education, advocacy, and outreach, with funding mechanisms like fee-for-service, managed care, or hybrid approaches[42]. These policies reflect the growing recognition of CHWs’ role in addressing the social determinants of health and expanding access to culturally competent care across the United States.

While Medicare reimburses CHW services as part of a provider’s care plan, efforts are underway to expand direct CHW funding and eliminate patient cost-sharing. Proposed legislation, such as the Community Health Worker Access Act, aims to improve Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, promoting CHW services for broader health equity and cost savings[43].

Evidence Review
Note: The vocabulary used in the table is the same terminology used in the study in order to preserve the integrity of the summary. 
Study
Population
Intervention Summary
Type of Study Design
Outcomes
Costich et al. (2019)

Caregivers of children with special healthcare needs.

The SKATE (Special Kids  Achieving Their  Everything) CHW  program. Enrolled families participate in a three to six month intervention that includes home visits, needs assessments, and goal-setting sessions during which caregivers and/or patients have the opportunity to develop their own goals. CHWs attend interdisciplinary medical home meetings at the practices weekly and provide updates to providers, nurse care managers, nursing staff, and social workers. CHWs serve as points of contact for families and assist with the navigation of resources available both in the community and in the medical home. 

Retrospective pre-post analysis. 

Social: On completion of the program, there was a significant improvement in caregiver distress scores (P < .001) and in understanding of their children's diagnoses (P < .001). Furthermore, the number of caregivers reporting food or housing issues was significantly reduced (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively).

Freeman et al. (2020)

Residents of two subsidized housing buildings in New York City.

The Health + Housing Project, a CHW intervention aimed to address residents’ self-identified health-related needs, including social and economic risk factors. CHWs conducted an intake form, worked with the resident on goal setting and action plan development, and then met with residents as frequently as needed over the course of 15 months to do motivational interviewing and helped them achieve their goals.

Pre-post analysis of surveys three months before and after the intervention. Of the 819 estimated adult building residents, 390 (48%) completed a baseline survey. Of those, 226 (58% of survey takers) completed an intake with a CHW. Most intervention participants were female (61%) and Latinx (69%), 28% were 65 years or older, 63% had a household income of less than $20,000, and many reported having chronic diseases. Of the 226 participants, 172 (76%) completed both baseline and post-intervention surveys.

Healthcare Cost, Utilization & Value: No immediate change was seen in acute healthcare use. However, there were significant improvements in residents’ connection to primary care.

Health: No immediate change was seen in defined health outcomes.

Social: Compared with the baseline, the percentage of participants who reported food insecurity and the inability to pay rent on time after the intervention significantly decreased. 

Significantly fewer participants reported needing and being unable to access food, a place to exercise, job training or employment placement programs, and education.

Gepp (2018)

Latino community, nationwide (UnidosUS program). National, community-based program "Comprando Rico y Sano" (Buying Healthy and Flavorful Foods).

The use of promotores de salud (community health workers) to reduce hunger and food insecurity by educating Latinos on healthy shopping and eating habits and providing SNAP enrollment assistance. The program aimed to dispel misconceptions about SNAP and thoroughly review the application process with participants.

Issue brief, descriptive study with program impact data.

n = 73,602 participants

Social: 

  • 73,602 participants received face-to-face nutrition education and SNAP information; 25,636 enrolled in SNAP
  • 2.5 million were reached via traditional and social media with nutrition and SNAP enrollment messages.

Gray et al. (2021)

Low-income adults (incomes <250% of the federal poverty line) from three Washington State health systems with type 2 diabetes and a HbA1c ≥ 8%.

In-home community health worker-led intervention. CHWs develop and revise diabetes self-management plans, including setting behavioral goals, identifying actions to achieve those goals, evaluating progress, addressing challenges and concerns, and providing education and referrals to group activities and community resources. 

Randomized controlled trial.  

Enrollment: CHW intervention = 145 participants; usual care (control) = 142 participants

Social: Compared to controls, intervention participants engaged in more physical activity and reported better dietary behaviors for some measures (general diet, frequency of skipping meals, and frequency of eating out) at 12 months, but there was no evidence of mediation by self-efficacy or social support. Evidence of moderation was limited: improvements in the frequency of skipping meals were restricted to participants with baseline HbA1c < 10%.

Hamilton et al. (2024)

Residents in permanent supportive housing (PSH) in Houston, Texas. Age was obtained for 81 residents, ranging from 25 to 73 years (mean age of 55.8 years). The majority of baseline respondents identified as male (n = 64; 77.1%), while 18 identified as female (21.7%), and 1 identified as a transgender female (1.2%). The majority also identified as Black/African American (n = 61; 73.5%), while 13 (15.7%) identified as Non-Hispanic White, 2 (2.4%) identified as Asian, 2 (2.4%) identified as Hispanic/Latinx, 1 (1.2%) identified as American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 1 (1.2%) identified as Arab/Middle Eastern American.

CHWs engaged food insecure PSH residents in meal planning, label reading, and delivery of healthy foods through (1) the distribution of 176 large boxes of food (fresh vegetables and nonperishable items from the bi-weekly distribution provided by the regional food bank); (2) linkage to food pantries (both through the distribution of flyers with directions and/or accompanying residents to pick up food); (3) assisting residents with SNAP benefits in signing up for Amazon Fresh deliveries since there was not a grocery store close-by. They also provided residents with necessary kitchen items so they could cook and eat healthy food in their Single Residency Occupancies (pots/pans, dishes, utensils/flatware, and small cooking appliances).

Descriptive data. 83 PSH residents completed the baseline USDA Food Security Survey, which included additional needs assessment items. 140 total residents completed 294 separate individual-level interventions by the end of the one-year pilot. 

Social: 55% of residents improved food security scores between baseline and the 90-day follow-up however food insecurity remained a concern. Of the 294 interventions, the most common was pantry inspections for food insecurity/nutritional deficiency and the second most common was social services assistance including SNAP and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)applications and linkage to primary care.

Kangovi et al. (2018)

Patients from three primary care facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and who resided in a high-poverty zip code, were insured or publicly insured, and had a diagnosis for two or more chronic diseases.  Participants were recruited between January 28, 2015, and March 28, 2016. 

Of the 592 participants, 370 (62.5%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 52.6 (11.1) years.

CHWs used a semi-structured interview guide to assess their socioeconomic determinants of health (e.g., trauma, food insecurity, housing instability, drug and alcohol use, or family stress). CHWs provided six months of tailored support spanning the domains of coaching, social support, advocacy, and navigation to help patients achieve their action plans.

Two-armed, single-masked, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Follow-up assessments were conducted at six and nine months after enrollment. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. 

Study enrollment (n)= 592

Healthcare Cost, Utilization & Value: Patients in the intervention group were more likely to report the highest quality of care (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4; risk difference [RD], 0.12; P < .001) and spent fewer total days in the hospital at six months (155 days vs 345 days; absolute event rate reduction, 69%) and nine months (300 days vs 471 days; absolute event rate reduction, 65%). This reduction was driven by a shorter average length of stay (difference, −3.1 days; 95% CI, −6.33 to 0.22; P = .06) and a lower mean number of hospitalizations (difference, −0.3; 95% CI, −0.6 to 0.0; P = .07) among patients who were hospitalized. Patients in the intervention group had lower odds of repeat hospitalizations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; RD, −0.24; P = .02), including 30-day readmissions (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9; RD, −0.17; P = .04).

Health: Participants in both arms had similar improvements in self-rated physical health (mean [SD], 1.8 [11.2] vs 1.6 [9.9]; P = .89). 

Murray et al. (2023)

Patients from an academic medical center with type 2 diabetes and self-reported food insecurity. Participants were 84% female, 32% Black, and 58 years on average, with an average HbA1c of 8%.

The intervention used a community health worker to address food insecurity for individuals by linking them to resources for sustainable food access with the goal of improving diabetes outcomes. Control group participants received food alone while the intervention group received food in combination with community health work counseling and resource linkage.

Pilot randomized controlled study.

n=31

Health: For the intervention group, there was a statistically significant reduction in the average value of HbA1c by 0.85 points from baseline to three months (p=0.039) and by 1.65 points from baseline to six months (p=0.012). 81% of participants in the intervention group (13/16) had a reduction in HbA1c over the course of the intervention. There was no significant change in HbA1c for the control group at either time point. Diastolic blood pressure increased 6.5 mmHg (p= 0.02) between baseline and three months for the control group and remained stable for the intervention group. Systolic blood pressure and weight showed no significant changes for either group. 

Rascón et al. (2022)

Participants in the Comprando Rico y Sano program, a national, community-based program.

The Comprando Rico y Sano program provided nutrition education and SNAP enrollment assistance through community health workers (promotores de salud). 

A quasi-experimental study with pre-, post-, and follow-up surveys assessing changes in nutrition behavior and SNAP enrollment. 997 participants were recruited, of which 989 completed the pre-survey, and 132 completed the three-month follow-up survey.

Social: Increased nutrition knowledge and healthy food consumption were observed, and 10,502 households received SNAP enrollment/recertification assistance (6,356 new applications and 4,416 recertifications).

Systematic Reviews
Note: The vocabulary used in the table is the same terminology used in the study in order to preserve the integrity of the summary. 
Study
Population
Intervention Summary
Type of Study Design
Outcomes
No items found.
Assessment Synthesis Criteria
Strong Evidence
There is strong evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect; and  
  • Consistent findings of health effects from other studies (cohort, case-control, and other designs). 

Sufficient Evidence
There is sufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect, but inconsistent findings in other studies; or
  • Consistent findings from at least three non-randomized control trial studies (cohorts, practical trials, analysis of secondary data); or
  • A single, sufficiently large, well-conducted, randomized controlled trial demonstrating a clinically meaningful health effect and consistent evidence from other studies; or 
  • Multiple expert opinions/government agencies supporting the intervention. 

More Evidence Needed or Mixed Evidence
There is insufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes, however the results may indicate potential impact.
  • Lack of demonstration of improved health outcomes based on any of the following: (a) a systematic review or meta-analysis; (b) a large randomized controlled trial; (c) consistent positive results from multiple studies in high-quality journals; or (d) multiple expert opinions or government agencies supporting the intervention. 
  • An insufficient evidence rating does not mean there is no evidence or that the intervention is unsafe or ineffective. 
  • In many cases, there is a need for more research or longer-term follow-up.
There is strong evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
There is sufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
There is insufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes, however the results may indicate potential impact.
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect; and  
  • Consistent findings of health effects from other studies (cohort, case-control, and other designs). 

  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect, but inconsistent findings in other studies; or
  • Consistent findings from at least three non-randomized control trial studies (cohorts, practical trials, analysis of secondary data); or
  • A single, sufficiently large, well-conducted, randomized controlled trial demonstrating a clinically meaningful health effect and consistent evidence from other studies; or 
  • Multiple expert opinions/government agencies supporting the intervention. 

  • Lack of demonstration of improved health outcomes based on any of the following: (a) a systematic review or meta-analysis; (b) a large randomized controlled trial; (c) consistent positive results from multiple studies in high-quality journals; or (d) multiple expert opinions or government agencies supporting the intervention. 
  • An insufficient evidence rating does not mean there is no evidence or that the intervention is unsafe or ineffective. 
  • In many cases, there is a need for more research or longer-term follow-up.
Sources

[1] American Public Health Association. Community Health Workers. Last Accessed November 5, 2024. 

[2] National Association of Community Health Workers https://nachw.org/about/#:~:text=Community%20Health%20Worker%20is%20an,where%20they%20live%20and%20serve. Last Accessed: October 5, 2024

[3] National Association of Community Health Workers. (2019, November 4). *Community health workers: Social determinants of health and public health preparedness* (PCORI Report). Retrieved from https://nachw.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FUSA-HE-CHWs-HEV_PCORI-CHW-Report_11-04-19.pdf

[4] Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt MP, Gregory CA, et al. Household Food Security in the United States in 2021. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service; 2022. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104656/err-309.pdf?v=6629.3. Accessed on April 10, 2023.

[5] Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt MP, Gregory CA, et al. Household Food Security in the United States in 2021. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service; 2022. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104656/err-309.pdf?v=6629.3. Accessed on April 10, 2023.

[6] Nord, M. Characteristics of low-income households with very low food security: an analysis of the USDA GPRA food security indicator. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Serv. 2007. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/44171/11530_eib25_1_.pdf?v=5687.7.  Last Accessed: April 13, 2023. 

[7] United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) A, HealthyPeople 2030. Food Insecurity. Available at: https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health/literature-summaries/food-insecurity. Accessed on April 13, 2023. 

[8] Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, et al. Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. American Journal of Public Health. 2005; (95):660-667. 

[9] United States Department of Agriculture. Food Insecurity.Available at: https://www.usda.gov/nutrition-security. Last Accessed: September 25, 2024

[10] Mozaffarian, D. “Measuring And Addressing Nutrition Security To Achieve Health And Health Equity, " Health Affairs Health Policy Brief, March 30, 2023.

[11] Eicher-Miller HA, Graves L, McGowan B, Mayfield BJ, Connolly BA, Stevens W, Abbott A. A Scoping Review of Household Factors Contributing to Dietary Quality and Food Security in Low-Income Households with School-Age Children in the United States. Adv Nutr. 2023 Jul;14(4):914-945. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 13.

[12] Rehm CD, Peñalvo JL, Afshin A, Mozaffarian D. Dietary Intake Among US Adults, 1999-2012. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2542–2553. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7491

[13] Moore LV, Thompson FE, Demissie Z. Percentage of youth meeting federal fruit and vegetable intake recommendations, youth risk behavior surveillance system, United States and 33 States, 2013. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(4):545-553.e3. 

[14] Lee-Kwan SH, Moore LV, Blanck HM, et al. Disparities in state-specific adult fruit and vegetable consumption — United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:1241–1247. 

[15] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) A, HealthyPeople 2030. Increase fruit consumption by people aged 2 years and over – NWS-06. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/increase-fruit-consumption-people-aged-2-years-and-over-nws-06. Last Accessed: October 21, 2022.

[16] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) B, HealthyPeople 2030. Increase vegetables consumption by people aged 2 years and over – NWS-07. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/increase-vegetable-consumption-people-aged-2-years-and-older-nws-07. Last Accessed: October 21, 2022. 

[17] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) C, HealthyPeople 2030. Increase consumption of dark green vegetables, red and orange vegetables, and beans and peas by people aged 2 years and over – NWS-08. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/increase-consumption-dark-green-vegetables-red-and-orange-vegetables-and-beans-and-peas-people-aged-2-years-and-over-nws-08. Last Accessed: October 21, 2022.

[18] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) D, HealthyPeople 2030. Increase potassium consumption by people aged 2 years and over – NWS-14. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/increase-potassium-consumption-people-aged-2-years-and-over-nws-14. Last Accessed: October 21, 2022. 

[19] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) E, HealthyPeople 2030. Increase calcium consumption by people aged 2 years and over – NWS-13. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/increase-calcium-consumption-people-aged-2-years-and-over-nws-13. Last Accessed: November 30, 2022. 

[20] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) F, HealthyPeople 2030. Reduce household food insecurity and hunger – NWS-01. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/reduce-household-food-insecurity-and-hunger-nws-01. Last Accessed: November 30, 2022. 

[21] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) G, HealthyPeople 2030. Eliminate very low food security in children – NWS-02. Retrieved from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/eliminate-very-low-food-security-children-nws-02. Last Accessed: November 30, 2022.

[22] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) A. Poor nutrition. 2022. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/about/index.html . Accessed on November 17, 2022.

[23] Corona G, Dubowitz T, Troxel WM, et al. Neighborhood food environment associated with cardiometabolic health among predominately low-income, urban, Black women. Ethnicity & Disease. 2021; 31(4):537-546.

[24] Gundersen C, Ziliak JP. Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34(11):1830-1839. 

[25] United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) A, HealthyPeople 2030. Food Insecurity. Available at: https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health/literature-summaries/food-insecurity. Accessed on April 13, 2023. 

[26] Holben DH, Pheley AM. Diabetes risk and obesity in food-insecure households in rural Appalachian Ohio. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006; 3(3):1-9.

[27] Seligman HK, Smith M, Rosenmoss S, et al. Comprehensive diabetes self-management support from food banks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(9):1227-1234.

[28]  Hill JO, Galloway JM, Goley A, et al. Scientific Statement: Socioecological Determinants of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(8):2430–2439.

[29] Ryu, J.-H., & Bartfeld, J. S. (2012). Household food insecurity during childhood and subsequent health status: The Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—kindergarten cohort. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11). https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2012.300971 

[30]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) B, 2022. Childhood obesity facts. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/obesity-overweight.htm. Accessed on September 27, 2022

[31] Mazimba S, Peterson PN. JAHA spotlight on racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10(17):1-4.

[32] American Cancer Society (ACS). Colorectal cancer rates higher in African Americans, rising in younger people. 2020. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/colorectal-cancer-rates-higher-in-african-americans-rising-in-younger-people.html. Accessed on October 25, 2022.

[33] Gundersen C, Ziliak JP. Food Insecurity And Health Outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Nov;34(11):1830-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0645. PMID: 26526240.

[34] Dantas de Oliveria et.al.,  Household food insecurity and early childhood development: systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 2020; 16 (3). 

[35]  Tarasuk, V., Cheng, J., Oliveira, C. de, Dachner, N., Gundersen, C., & Kurdyak, P. (2015, October 6). Association between household food insecurity and annual health care costs. CMAJ. Retrieved 2023, from https://www.cmaj.ca/content/187/14/E429  

[36]  Johnson, K. T., Palakshappa, D., Basu, S., Seligman, H., & Berkowitz, S. A. (2021). Examining the bidirectional relationship between food insecurity and healthcare spending. Health Services Research, 56(5), 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13641 

[37]  Palakshappa, D., Garg, A., Peltz, A., Wong, C. A., Cholera, R., &amp; Berkowitz, S. A. (2023). Food insecurity was associated with greater family health care expenditures in the US, 2016–17. Health Affairs, 42(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00414 

[38]  Peltz, A., & Garg, A. (2019). Food insecurity and health care use. Pediatrics, 144(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0347 

[39] National Association of Community Health Workers. (2023, June). Translation summary: Assessing CHW workforce. Retrieved from https://nachw.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/06.04Translation-SummaryAssessingCHWWorkforce.pdf

[40] Connecticut Health Foundation. (n.d.). 50-state scan of Medicaid payment for community health workers. Retrieved from https://www.cthealth.org/publication/50-state-scan-of-medicaid-payment-for-community-health-workers/

[41]  Connecticut Health Foundation. (2024, January). CHW Medicaid policies and reimbursement approaches by state. Retrieved from https://www.cthealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CHW-Medicaid-Policies-and-Reimbursement-Approaches-by-State.pdf

[42] Haldar, S., Jan 23, E. H. P., & 2023. (2023, January 23). State Policies for Expanding Medicaid Coverage of Community Health Worker (CHW) Services. KFF. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/state-policies-for-expanding-medicaid-coverage-of-community-health-worker-chw-services/

[43] Transform Health Center. (n.d.). What’s next for CHWs? Integrating Medicare reimbursement. Retrieved from https://transformhc.com/whats-next-for-chws-integrating-medicare-reimbursement/

Contact Us!

Would you like to request additional information or support from HealthBegins?
CTA Left ImageCTA Right Image
No items found.
close Popup

Get Involved and Stay Connected

Be the first to receive updates on the Social Needs Investment Lab and how to participate.